The Architecture of Power: Agency vs. Control

It has been a little while since I last shared an update here. In the time I have been away, I have spent a lot of time reflecting on the work I’ve been doing—specifically, the deep dives into Madagascar’s economy, the challenges of tax reform, and the frustrating reality of how structural issues often stall progress.

While writing about budget deficits and remittances is vital, I found myself constantly hitting a wall: the question of why. Why do certain reforms that seem so logical on paper fail to take root in practice? Why does the system seem to prioritize certain outcomes over others, regardless of the economic data?

I realized that to truly understand the economic challenges I’ve been documenting, I needed to zoom out. I needed to look at the "plumbing" of the political systems themselves. 

That is why I am starting a new series. We are going to move beyond the usual political labels—which often feel like they are built for Western contexts and don't quite fit the realities we see on the ground—and instead look at politics through a more universal lens: the tension between Agency (the power of the individual to act) and Control (the power of the state to direct).

In this series, we will explore how different nations navigate this tension. We will look at the "Sovereignty Pivot" in places like Burkina Faso, the "Hybrid Reality" of countries like Madagascar, and the theoretical ideals of Liberal Democracy. My goal is to move past the rhetoric and look at the actual trade-offs being made—and what they mean for the people living through them.

I am looking forward to getting back into the conversation with you all. Let’s start at the beginning.

When we discuss politics, we often get bogged down in labels. We talk about "democracy," "authoritarianism," or "socialism" as if they are fixed boxes. But these labels often hide more than they reveal, especially when we view them through the lens of Western-centric stereotypes.

If we want to understand how the world actually works, we need a clearer, more universal metric. We need to look at the tension between two fundamental forces: Agency and Control.

The Two Poles of the Human Experience

At its simplest, every political system is a mechanism for answering one question: Who gets to decide?

*   Agency is the capacity of an individual to act, build, and influence their environment. It is the freedom to choose your path, start a business, speak your mind, and hold those in power accountable. It is the engine of innovation and personal dignity.

*   Control is the capacity of the state to direct, constrain, and dictate. It is the mechanism of order, stability, and collective mobilization. It is the state’s demand for conformity and obedience.

Every political system sits somewhere on a spectrum between these two poles.

The Trade-Off

The reason politics is so messy is that both Agency and Control have value. 

We crave Agency because we want to be the authors of our own lives. We want to solve problems in our communities, improve our economies, and ensure that our hard work leads to a better future. When agency is high, society is vibrant but often "noisy" and slow to reach a consensus.

We crave Control because we fear chaos. We want to be safe, we want national unity, and we want decisive leadership that can cut through gridlock. When control is high, society is orderly and predictable, but it often comes at the cost of the individual’s ability to breathe, innovate, or speak the truth.

Why This Matters

When we look at the world this way, the "labels" start to matter less. 

A country might call itself a democracy, but if the average citizen has no real power to change their economic reality, is that system truly serving their agency? Conversely, a country might adopt a "strongman" model, promising order and national pride, but if that control comes at the expense of every individual’s ability to act, are they actually building a future, or just reinforcing a cage?

In this series, we are going to move beyond the usual political jargon. We are going to examine different systems by asking a simple, universal question: Does this system empower the individual to act, or does it demand the individual to submit?

By focusing on this balance, we can better understand the choices nations make—and the consequences that follow.

​